Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Methods of Advanced Literary Studies

Dr. Scanlon. ENGL 295. Fall 2013.

Methods of Advanced Literary Studies

Main menu

  • Home
  • Applied Analysis Dates
  • Assignments
    • Rubrics
  • Bridge Dates
  • Collaborative Groups
  • Readings
  • Schedule
  • Syllabus
  • Tech HowTo

Tag Archives: I feel like this could work

Poetry paper assignment posted

Posted on November 19, 2013 by mscanlon
Reply

Here and in Canvas.

Also: next Tuesday, November 26, will be an optional scansion workshop in class.  Students desiring reinforcement of the methods of scanning lines

(marking accents, dividing into feet, naming feet),

which will be required for the poetry paper, can attend that day for help and practice.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged bring it, down the rabbit hole, eckleburg is watching you, I feel like this could work, not even leo could make this better, practicality, stop drinking and start scanning, stop fussing and learn to love it, they don't call me dr. scansion for nothing | Leave a reply

Reminder

Posted on November 4, 2013 by mscanlon
Reply

You need to bring a strong draft of the thesis statement for your drama paper TOMORROW, 11/5.  See assignment for more details.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged all together now, and so it begins, down the rabbit hole, eckleburg is watching you, i can blog til the cows come home, I feel like this could work, not even leo could make this better, ready set go, Sarah Ruhl, stop fussing and learn to love it, this is all ms. scanlons fault, writing process, you heart thesis statements | Leave a reply

Thank you Wikipedia, Our Postmodern Authority

Posted on October 1, 2013 by mscanlon
Reply

Can’t get enough of Baudrillard and similacra?  This is pretty clear.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged brevity is not my strong suit, bring it, done and done, foiled again!, Glozing, good morning class, I feel like this could work, not even leo could make this better, Note to self: no more going out on theoretical limbs, stop drinking and start reading, stop fussing and learn to love it, theory, this is all ms. scanlons fault, wikipedia for all | Leave a reply

It’s a Film Fest, Old Sport!

Posted on September 26, 2013 by mscanlon
Reply

GATSBY

Friday, September 27

7:00-12:00

Combs 237

approximate times: Redford/Farrow at 7:00, DiCaprio/Mulligan around 9:00

NEW INFO: The 9:30 section has successfully argued for extra credit opportunities here.  To get such credit, you MUST write a 500-600 word response/analysis (not a review or summary).  You may focus on one or both films.  I strongly encourage you to join us for our event if you can, but if you have to work or have other commitments, you may watch the film(s) alone and still submit an analysis for extra credit.

Extra credit on both this and Miss Firecracker

should be submitted before Fall Break.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Beautiful people and some movie stars too, bring it, eckleburg is watching you, I feel like this could work, let's do some film fests!, potluck, Sexual'ly Mysterious'ly Gay'ly Gastbyly Nick'ly, this is all ms. scanlons fault, twizzlers galore | Leave a reply

Hannah Morgan’s Reader-Response Analysis of the Giving Tree

Posted on September 19, 2013 by hmorgan8
5

For my reader-response theory post, I have chosen to analyze the children’s book The Giving Tree by Shel Silverstein, a beloved book of my childhood that prompts mixed feelings for me:  comfort and uncertainty, pleasure and melancholy.  It’s a bittersweet story.  The disparate positive and negative emotions leave me feeling a little weary, but cleansed, which I propose is part of the reading experience pre-structured by the text. 

The Giving Tree reading

The book opens with a pleasant image, a tree and a little boy who spend every day together enjoying each other’s company.  We aren’t given much information about the tree, save for her introduction on the first two pages:  “Once, there was a tree… and she loved a little boy.”  We aren’t told details, like what type of tree she is.  (We find out later.)  All that matters now is her unconditional love for the little boy, and readers sense a parental relationship between the two.  There’s an atmosphere of joy.  However, the terse writing style foreshadows some impending sorrow.  The reader is led to sense that the present joy is fleeting.

Indeed, it is.  The boy grows up to seek bigger and better things, leaving his friend.  The boy returns a few times, yet he’s always somber.  In contrast, the tree practically bursts with joy to see him.  She says,

“Come, Boy, come and climb up my trunk and swing from my branches and eat apples and play in my shade and be happy!”

“I am too big to climb and play” said the boy.

And he always proceeds to ask something of her, whether it’s money or a house or a boat for him to sail away.  His answers to her suggestion “be happy” indicate that he is “too big,” “too busy,” or “too old and sad” to be happy, a hopeless attitude that sharply contrasts with the tree’s joyful generosity.  She never refuses his requests, but offers up every piece of herself without hesitation.  The boy takes her apples, branches, and trunk, and sets off to try to find happiness, until finally all that’s left of her is the stump, at which point she “was happy… but not really.” 

Throughout the story, the reader is given images of the boy’s return and the tree’s joy.  In my own interpretation, the boy seems to come with a heavy heart, disappointed in his failure to find contentment.  Note that the reader isn’t told what he does when he leaves, and it’s left up to our interpretation to “fill in the gaps” regarding why the boy always return so unhappy. 

Thus, there is perpetual conflict between the tree’s bigheartedness and the boy’s seeming brokenness.  Despite his apparent heartache, he always returns to the tree, his mother figure.  Only when he returns simply for her company is there a sense of peace. 

Still, I personally feel weary when I finish this book, a little overwhelmed by the boy’s sorrow and only mildly comforted by the tree’s kindness.  According to reader-response theory, this may be because of my psychological state.  I am familiar with heartache, and it’s my coping mechanism to empathize with characters who are like me.  Yet I am also a bit suspicious of the boy.  After all of his coming and going, how do we know he won’t leave again?  My automatic response is to feel a little uncertain about the book’s ending, and I think this somewhat reflects the book’s theme that material happiness is uncertain.

What is the implied reader of such a poignant text?  Though it’s a children’s book, I think the complex readership experience may also anticipate a more mature reader, most specifically a parent reading to a child.  The combination of a parent and child pair reading together mirrors the parental relationship between the tree and the boy, and it accentuates the pleasant ending for the readers, as tree and boy are at last content together.  On the other hand, if a parent or child were to read the story alone, he or she may have a very different reading experience, noticing more the lonely aspect of the text when the characters were apart.  Thus, readers can interpret it differently depending on their psychological state and relation to others.

As for me, I tend to identify with an interpretive community that relies on analyzing the emotions of a text, and this book is very emotional for me, and it’s for this emotion that I love it so much.  What’s your interpretation?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged applied theory, brevity is not my strong suit, I feel like this could work, reader-response, The Giving Tree | 5 Replies

Submitting Applied Theory assignments

Posted on September 13, 2013 by mscanlon
Reply

People, Sam noticed that my syllabus said to drop the url for your applied theory post into the Bridge assignment.  I meant, of course, the applied theory assignment.  I will be grading these this weekend if possible and will look for problems, but if you put yours in the wrong place, resubmit under the right assignment, please.  Syllabus is now updated.  My apologies.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged are you calling me angsty?, Glozing, I feel like this could work, I was angry the whole time, is TOO a text, Karl Marx who?, let's do some film fests!, mea culpa, not even leo could make this better, old sport | Leave a reply

Pot luck and Great Gatsby Movie showing

Posted on September 5, 2013 by adavis7
6

Hello all! I’m trying to organize a time when both sections could get together for a movie night/potluck! I have two doodles for the event. The first will be to decide when we will host the viewing which I will close two weeks from today (9/5). The second doodle is to lay claim on what type of snack to bring and that I’ll leave open until the night of the viewing just to be sure we don’t have too many overlaps. If you find I’ve missed something major in my categories then just shoot me an email or reply to this post. I encourage you to bring non plastics just because most people have plates and such and that way we don’t clog landfills.

I really hope this turns out

Adrienne of the 11:00 section

your humble planner

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged I feel like this could work, Leo, potluck, Robert Redford, The Great Gats | 6 Replies

Join the Blog

  • If you want to add yourself to this blog, please log in.

Recent Posts

  • Shells
  • Government Property
  • Journal 2 Burroway’s warm up
  • Bedtime Prayer
  • The Remnant

Recent Comments

  • Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, But the <em>Rolling</em> Stones Should Be Banned From Trader Joe’s! | Michigan Standard on Madeleine’s Deconstructive Analysis of “Under My Thumb”
  • Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, But the Rolling Stones Should Be Banned From Trader Joe’s! - The Populist Wire on Madeleine’s Deconstructive Analysis of “Under My Thumb”
  • Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, But the Rolling Stones Should Be Banned From Trader Joe’s! » RickMick on Madeleine’s Deconstructive Analysis of “Under My Thumb”
  • bmytelka on Karista’s Feminist Analysis of “Pocahontas”
  • bmytelka on Karista’s Feminist Analysis of “Pocahontas”

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Cloud 295

  • 302poetry
  • Alice in Wonderland
  • and so it begins
  • applied theory
  • brevity is not my strong suit
  • bridge to the blog
  • bring it
  • Deconstructive criticism
  • done and done
  • down the rabbit hole
  • eckleburg is watching you
  • feminism
  • gatsby
  • Glozing
  • good morning class
  • Great Gatsby
  • i can blog til the cows come home
  • I feel like this could work
  • I was angry the whole time
  • Lacan
  • let's do some film fests!
  • Marxist criticism
  • naughty list looms
  • not even leo could make this better
  • old sport
  • Passion Play
  • potluck
  • practicality
  • Psychoanalytic Criticism
  • Queer Theory
  • reader-response
  • reader response criticism
  • ready set go
  • richter
  • section2
  • Sexual'ly Mysterious'ly Gay'ly Gastbyly Nick'ly
  • stop drinking and start reading
  • stop fussing and learn to love it
  • The Great Gatsby
  • theory
  • this is all ms. scanlons fault
  • Tyson
  • what do you mean you haven't posted yet?
  • women
  • you love technology
Proudly powered by WordPress